Decision Framework
Build vs Buy: Complete Decision Framework
A practical framework for deciding when to build custom features versus buying or integrating third-party solutions. Includes total cost of ownership calculations and real-world scenarios.
By PocketCTO Team · Last updated February 2026 · 14 min read
Contents
The Problem: Should you build a custom invoicing system or use Stripe Billing? Build a custom CRM or use HubSpot? Build proprietary AI features or use OpenAI's API? Every technology decision is a build vs buy decision, and the wrong choice wastes months and tens of thousands of dollars.
The Solution: A repeatable framework that evaluates build vs buy decisions through five lenses: total cost of ownership, strategic value, time to market, risk, and reversibility.
The Build vs Buy Decision
Every feature, tool, or system you need can theoretically be built custom or purchased as a third-party solution. The build vs buy decision is fundamentally a resource allocation question: where should you invest engineering time?
Why This Decision Matters
Engineering time is your scarcest resource. Every hour spent building a custom CRM is an hour NOT spent building your core product. Every dollar spent on SaaS subscriptions is a dollar NOT available for hiring or marketing.
Get build vs buy wrong and you:
- Build custom solutions that could've been solved with $50/month SaaS
- Integrate 15 SaaS tools with duct tape when a single custom system would be cleaner
- Create technical debt that compounds for years
- Miss market windows while engineering builds non-differentiated features
The Build vs Buy Decision Framework
Evaluate every build vs buy decision through these five lenses:
1. Strategic Value: Is This a Competitive Differentiator?
Core question: Would customers choose us over competitors because of how we implement this feature?
Build if:
- This feature is central to your unique value proposition
- How you implement this enables a business model competitors can't replicate
- Customer experience would be meaningfully worse with a generic solution
- Proprietary data or algorithms create defensible competitive advantage
Buy if:
- Customers care that it works, not how you built it
- Competitors use third-party solutions for this without losing deals
- This is table stakes functionality, not differentiation
Examples: Email delivery, authentication, payment processing, analytics—these are almost never differentiators. Buy them.
2. Total Cost of Ownership: What's the Real Cost Over 36 Months?
Most founders dramatically underestimate build costs and overestimate SaaS costs. Calculate honestly.
Build costs include:
- Upfront development (estimate hours × $100-$200/hour)
- Ongoing maintenance (bugs, security updates, dependency updates)
- Feature enhancements as requirements evolve
- Documentation and knowledge transfer
- Opportunity cost (what else could the team build?)
Buy costs include:
- Monthly or annual subscription fees (× 36 months)
- Integration/implementation costs
- Training and change management
- Support overhead when things break
- Potential switching costs if you outgrow the tool
Reality check: A feature that "only takes 2 weeks to build" actually takes 4 weeks (scope creep), requires 2 hours/month maintenance, and 1 week/year for enhancements. Over 3 years that's ~60 days of engineering time = $96k at $200/day. Is it really cheaper than $500/month SaaS?
3. Time to Market: How Fast Do You Need This?
Speed has strategic value. Launching 3 months earlier can be the difference between winning and losing a market.
Build if:
- You're not in a rush to launch this specific feature
- Building gives you learning that's strategically valuable
- Engineering has spare capacity (rare!)
Buy if:
- You need this feature to close deals NOW
- Speed to market is a competitive advantage in your space
- Every week of delay costs you customers or funding opportunities
4. Risk Assessment: What Could Go Wrong?
Both building and buying carry risks. Evaluate likelihood and impact.
Build risks:
- Underestimating complexity (very common)
- Key engineer leaves and knowledge walks out the door
- Security vulnerabilities in custom code
- Maintenance burden grows faster than expected
Buy risks:
- Vendor goes out of business or gets acquired
- Vendor raises prices 10x after you're locked in
- Tool doesn't integrate well or has hidden limitations
- Vendor security breach affects your customers
Risk mitigation strategies:
- For build: Code reviews, documentation, security audits, abstraction layers
- For buy: Choose established vendors, negotiate price locks, ensure data export, maintain abstraction layers
5. Reversibility: How Hard Is It to Change Later?
Some decisions are easy to reverse, others lock you in for years.
Easy to reverse (low risk):
- Email platforms, analytics tools, help desk software
- Most horizontal SaaS (can switch with 1-2 weeks effort)
Hard to reverse (high risk):
- CRM or ERP (data migration nightmares)
- Core database or infrastructure
- Payment processing (PCI compliance, customer trust)
- Authentication systems (user credentials)
Decision rule: For easily reversible decisions, move fast and course-correct if needed. For hard-to-reverse decisions, invest more time in upfront evaluation.
Total Cost of Ownership Calculator
Use this simplified TCO framework to compare build vs buy options over 36 months:
| Cost Component | Build Custom | Buy SaaS |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Development | Estimated hours × hourly rate ($100-$200/hr) | Integration time (usually 8-40 hours) |
| Monthly Costs (× 36) | Maintenance (~10% of build cost annually) | Subscription fee × 36 months |
| Feature Enhancements | ~25% of initial build cost annually | Usually included in subscription |
| Training & Support | Documentation time + support burden | Vendor provides docs, support included |
| Opportunity Cost | What ELSE could team build? | Minimal (faster deployment) |
| Switching Cost | Sunk cost (code is asset but hard to reuse) | Data migration + integration (moderate) |
TCO Calculation Example: Invoicing System
Scenario: Should you build custom invoicing or use Stripe Billing ($50/month)?
Build option:
- Initial development: 160 hours × $150/hr = $24,000
- Maintenance: $24k × 10% × 3 years = $7,200
- Enhancements: $24k × 25% × 3 years = $18,000
- Opportunity cost: What else could 160 hours build?
- Total: $49,200+ over 36 months
Buy option (Stripe Billing):
- Integration: 16 hours × $150/hr = $2,400
- Subscription: $50/month × 36 months = $1,800
- Maintenance: Handled by Stripe
- Enhancements: Handled by Stripe
- Total: $4,200 over 36 months
Result: Buy saves $45k+ and 144 hours of engineering time. Unless custom invoicing is your competitive differentiator, this is an easy decision.
When to Build Custom Solutions
Building custom makes sense in specific scenarios. Here's when to build:
1. Core Product Differentiation
If the feature IS your product or core to your competitive advantage, build it.
Examples:
- Netflix's recommendation engine
- Uber's routing and dispatch algorithms
- Stripe's payment processing infrastructure
2. Unique Workflow or Requirements
When your workflow is truly unique and no SaaS comes close to fitting, building may be the only option.
Warning: Before building, ask "Is our workflow unique, or just different?" Often, adapting to a proven workflow is better than building custom.
3. Integration Complexity Exceeds Build Complexity
Sometimes duct-taping 5 SaaS tools together is more complex than building a unified custom solution.
Threshold: If you're integrating 3+ tools to accomplish one workflow, and integration costs exceed $20k, consider building.
4. Proprietary Data or Algorithms
When you have unique data or algorithms that create defensible competitive advantage, build to protect your IP.
Examples: ML models trained on proprietary data, industry-specific algorithms, unique data aggregation.
5. Unreasonable SaaS Pricing
When SaaS pricing doesn't scale with your business model—e.g., per-seat pricing when you need 1000 seats, or usage-based pricing that would cost $50k/month at your volume—building can make economic sense.
Threshold: If SaaS costs would exceed $100k/year and you can build for under $50k, run the numbers carefully.
When to Buy or Integrate SaaS Solutions
Default to buying in these scenarios:
1. Solved Problems
If the problem has been solved thousands of times, use a proven solution.
Examples:
- Email delivery (SendGrid, Postmark, AWS SES)
- Authentication (Auth0, Clerk, Firebase Auth)
- Payment processing (Stripe, Braintree)
- Analytics (Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Amplitude)
- Customer support (Intercom, Zendesk, Help Scout)
2. Compliance or Security Requirements
Let experts handle regulated domains. Building custom payment processing (PCI compliance), healthcare data storage (HIPAA), or tax calculation (nexus rules) is prohibitively expensive.
3. Rapid Feature Delivery
When you need functionality NOW to close deals or launch features, SaaS is almost always faster.
4. Non-Differentiated Functionality
Internal tools, admin dashboards, reporting—if customers never see it and it doesn't create competitive advantage, buy it.
5. Expertise Gap
If your team lacks expertise in a domain (e.g., fraud detection, tax calculation, video processing), use specialized vendors who've solved it thousands of times.
Hybrid Approaches: Best of Both Worlds
Sometimes the smartest approach combines building and buying.
1. Build on Platforms
Platforms like Salesforce, Shopify, or WordPress offer middle ground: more customization than SaaS, faster than from-scratch.
When to use: Your workflow needs customization but fits within a platform's domain (e.g., e-commerce on Shopify, sales automation on Salesforce).
2. SaaS + API Customization
Use SaaS for core functionality, build custom layers on top via API.
Example: Use Stripe for payment processing, build custom subscription management and billing UI on top using Stripe's API.
3. Incremental Replacement
Start with SaaS, replace with custom incrementally as ROI becomes clear.
Strategy:
- Launch with SaaS to validate demand and learn requirements
- Identify specific pain points or high-cost areas
- Build custom replacements for high-ROI pieces only
- Keep using SaaS for everything else
4. Abstraction Layers
Whether you build or buy, implement abstraction layers to make switching easier later.
Example: Instead of calling Stripe directly throughout your codebase, create a PaymentService abstraction. If you switch to Braintree later, you only change one module.
Common Build vs Buy Scenarios
Scenario: CRM System
Default: Buy (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive)
Build if: Your sales process is radically different from standard B2B sales, or you need deep integration with proprietary systems.
Reality: 95% of startups should buy. Custom CRMs rarely justify the cost.
Scenario: AI/ML Features
Default: Buy/API (OpenAI, Google Vertex, AWS SageMaker)
Build if: You have proprietary training data, need custom model architectures, or require on-premise deployment for IP protection.
Reality: Use APIs first, build custom models only when you have clear competitive advantage and $500k+ budget.
Scenario: Admin Dashboard
Default: Buy (Retool, Internal, Budibase)
Build if: Your admin needs are extremely simple (build takes under 2 weeks) or integration costs with low-code tools exceed build costs.
Reality: Low-code tools are so good now that custom admin dashboards rarely justify cost.
Scenario: Search Functionality
Default: Buy (Algolia, Meilisearch, Typesense)
Build if: Search IS your product (like Google), or you have highly specialized ranking requirements.
Reality: Building great search is harder than it looks. Use specialized tools unless search is your core competency.
Scenario: User Authentication
Default: Buy (Auth0, Clerk, Firebase Auth, AWS Cognito)
Build if: NEVER. Security is too important and auth is too complex. Always use proven platforms.
Reality: Custom auth is a liability, not an asset. Don't do it.
Scenario: Email Marketing
Default: Buy (Mailchimp, SendGrid, Customer.io)
Build if: You send billions of emails and pricing doesn't scale (rare), or you need deep integration with proprietary segmentation.
Reality: Email deliverability is hard. Use vendors with established sender reputations.
Common Questions About Build vs Buy
How do I calculate total cost of ownership for a build vs buy decision?
For build: upfront development cost (hours × hourly rate) + ongoing maintenance (bugs, updates, features) + opportunity cost (what else could the team build?). For buy: monthly/annual fees × 36 months + integration cost + potential switching costs. Don't forget hidden costs like training, support overhead, and technical debt.
Should I build if I can't find exactly what I need?
Not necessarily. Ask: Is my exact need truly unique, or am I being too specific? Can I adapt my workflow to fit an 80% solution? Often, the 20% you think you need isn't worth the 10x cost to build custom. Try the closest SaaS solution first—you might be surprised how well it works.
How much customization should I expect from a SaaS product?
Most modern SaaS offers: API access for integrations, webhook notifications, role-based permissions, and basic UI customization. Expect to adapt some workflows to fit the tool. If you need deep workflow customization, consider low-code platforms or build custom.
What if a vendor raises prices or gets acquired?
Mitigate vendor risk by: choosing established vendors with sustainable business models, negotiating price lock-ins for 1-2 years, ensuring data export capabilities, and maintaining abstraction layers in your code. For mission-critical systems, have a backup vendor identified.
Can I start with a SaaS tool and switch to custom later?
Yes, this is often the smartest approach. Use SaaS to validate demand and understand requirements, then build custom if/when ROI justifies it. Design your integration with an abstraction layer to make switching easier. Many successful companies run on SaaS for years before building custom solutions.
How do I know if building custom is a competitive advantage?
Ask: Would customers pay more or choose us over competitors because of this feature? Does this feature enable a business model others can't replicate? If customers don't care how you built it—only that it works—it's not a differentiator. Build where differentiation matters, buy everywhere else.
Should I build on top of a platform or build from scratch?
Platforms (Salesforce, Shopify, WordPress) offer middle ground: more customization than SaaS, faster than from-scratch. Choose platforms when you need moderate customization in a well-defined domain. Build from scratch only when your workflow is truly unique or platforms would constrain you unacceptably.
How do I evaluate build vs buy for AI features?
For AI: default to APIs (OpenAI, Google, AWS) unless you have proprietary data or unique model requirements. Building and training custom models costs $100k-$1M+ and requires specialized talent. Use API-based solutions to prove value, then consider custom models only if ROI is clear and defensibility matters.
Making Your Next Build vs Buy Decision
Next time you face a build vs buy decision, use this process:
- Define the requirement: What problem are you solving? What are the must-have vs nice-to-have features?
- Research solutions: Spend 2-3 hours researching SaaS options. Can any solve 80%+ of your need?
- Calculate TCO: Estimate 36-month total cost for top 2 SaaS options AND custom build
- Assess strategic value: Is this a competitive differentiator or table stakes?
- Evaluate time to market: How fast do you need this? What's the urgency?
- Check reversibility: How hard is it to switch later if you choose wrong?
- Get a second opinion: For decisions >$25k impact, get technical advisor or fractional CTO input
Default to Buy, Build Only When Justified
When in doubt, buy. SaaS tools are cheaper, faster, and lower risk than most founders realize. Build custom only when you have clear answers to:
- Why does this create competitive advantage?
- Why is TCO lower than SaaS over 36 months?
- Why can't we start with SaaS and build later if needed?
Need a second opinion on build vs buy?
Get a focused audit to compare options, model 36-month cost, and choose the lowest-risk path.
No obligation intro call - Typical response in 24 hours